HomieMcBro Posted August 16, 2023 Posted August 16, 2023 There was a glitch with the new trade-in feature that dropped today: players could trade-in their rental ships. Was working a few hours ago when the patch released, but has been disabled as of a few minutes ago. CVs, subs, countless glitches of varying severity, AA changes 'in the works', and so many other things with this game that haven't been addressed in months/years/ever. But then a feature that accidentally favors the players?? WG jumps on it instantly. Can't have the playerbase getting unintended benefits! 7
Frostbow Posted August 16, 2023 Posted August 16, 2023 11 minutes ago, HomieMcBro said: CVs, subs, countless glitches of varying severity, AA changes 'in the works', and so many other things with this game that haven't been addressed in months/years/ever. But then a feature that accidentally favors the players?? WG jumps on it instantly. Hahahahaha! The folks at WG must be crapping at their pants so hard already! LOL!
Daniel_Allan_Clark Posted August 16, 2023 Posted August 16, 2023 45 minutes ago, HomieMcBro said: There was a glitch with the new trade-in feature that dropped today: players could trade-in their rental ships. Was working a few hours ago when the patch released, but has been disabled as of a few minutes ago. CVs, subs, countless glitches of varying severity, AA changes 'in the works', and so many other things with this game that haven't been addressed in months/years/ever. But then a feature that accidentally favors the players?? WG jumps on it instantly. Can't have the playerbase getting unintended benefits! Oh no... Facepalm. Self inflicted wound there.
Nevermore135 Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 20 hours ago, Daniel_Allan_Clark said: Oh no... Facepalm. Self inflicted wound there. It really was. The trade-in feature was available on PTS, but players had no incentive to actually use it.
Lert Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 I can only see it as an attempt to get rid of population of rare / valuable (read: problematic) premiums in exchange for ones that are less so. I will not be making use of it.
Wolfswetpaws Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 10 minutes ago, Lert said: I can only see it as an attempt to get rid of population of rare / valuable (read: problematic) premiums in exchange for ones that are less so. I will not be making use of it. Aye.
ZeuSueZ1337 Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 Quelle surprise, eh WG? What a horse manuare company.... But on a more sober note, when stuff like diz happens "feature disabled, function stopped, etc" Where to put that kind of information on this forum? Just the general news section, or should there be a kind of dedicated "current stuff happening / know issue"-section/tread as to not just toss it all in one pile?
Utt_Bugglier Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 Daaannngg! Iād have driven home from the office or come in late yesterday to game the system on that one! š¤£šš Bet they just revoke those transactions, though. š¤Ā 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now