Frostbow Posted September 14, 2023 Posted September 14, 2023 15 minutes ago, BlackAdder1981 said: That's a deliberate leak. Not unlike how Google "accidentally" leaked the Pixel 8. LOL 1
Verblonde Posted September 14, 2023 Posted September 14, 2023 Just now, Frostbow said: That's a deliberate leak. I wouldn't be surprised; at the very least, the 'Rodney' bit should make a *lot* of Tea enthusiasts shiver in anticipation... 4
Ensign Cthulhu Posted September 14, 2023 Posted September 14, 2023 (edited) I felt a disturbance in the Force. As if a million weebs shouted out in exultation. ✌️ Edited September 14, 2023 by Ensign Cthulhu 1 5
EXEC_HYMNE_Ar_tonelico Posted September 14, 2023 Posted September 14, 2023 That is 100% deliberate. 2
AdmiralMcintosh Posted September 14, 2023 Posted September 14, 2023 So are we finally going to get HMS Rodney? 1
Project45_Opytny Posted September 14, 2023 Posted September 14, 2023 And Lesta has announced that they will add I-54, a Japanese submarine with a controllable catapult aircraft, into testing. There will still be many challenges though, for example, I-400-class are very large ones among their peers that would very likely ended up as rather sluggish handling, not to say what amounts of micro-management will be involved when playing a hybrid, aircraft carrying, submarine. A plenty of material has been collected for potential Soviet CV choices and many were surprised why WG would like to invent a "Project 23 AV" (and curiously make the entire Soviet CV branch as conversions on other hulls) rather than just adapting the Kostromitinov study. And the key point of concern is that how's the relations between the nascent WG Belgrade and the game's original creator team SPB Lesta Studio recently: are they still cooperating on a limited scale, or WG Belgrade is optimistic about their projected capacities in the near future, despite having to resort to brazen (and widely-panned) copy-pastes of Scharnhorst 43 and Stord 43 for some quick short-term profits? 1
HogHammer Posted September 14, 2023 Posted September 14, 2023 A "SUPER" St. Vincent and Nakhimov - my goodness 👀! 2
AdmiralMcintosh Posted September 14, 2023 Posted September 14, 2023 1 minute ago, HogHammer said: "SUPER" St. Vincent Can't imagine how overpowered that will be. 1
Yedwy Posted September 14, 2023 Posted September 14, 2023 1 hour ago, AdmiralMcintosh said: Can't imagine how overpowered that will be. 3x4@18"? 🤪 3
Sailor_Moon Posted September 14, 2023 Posted September 14, 2023 2 hours ago, Project45_Opytny said: And Lesta has announced that they will add I-54, a Japanese submarine with a controllable catapult aircraft, into testing. It's all but guaranteed that WE will be getting I-54 as well. Just like we'll be getting those Russian subs, and, I suspect, those balance changes. I have to admit, it's about time for HMS Rodney though :P
Verblonde Posted September 14, 2023 Posted September 14, 2023 HMS Plonker (for the British cognoscenti) has a certain ring to it... 1
Nevermore135 Posted September 15, 2023 Posted September 15, 2023 23 hours ago, Sailor_Moon said: I have to admit, it's about time for HMS Rodney though 😛 Vanguard could really use some company at tier VIII. However, she could also be a replacement for Nelson at tier VII. We don’t need another British tier VII BB.
Sailor_Moon Posted September 15, 2023 Posted September 15, 2023 (edited) 4 hours ago, Nevermore135 said: Vanguard could really use some company at tier VIII. However, she could also be a replacement for Nelson at tier VII. We don’t need another British tier VII BB. She's probably the replacement for Nelson though....so Tier VII but with different stats. Although....a Nelson with 32mm bow/stern plating and super heals could be interesting in tier VIII.... Edited September 15, 2023 by Sailor_Moon
Wolfswetpaws Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 On 9/14/2023 at 1:50 PM, Project45_Opytny said: And Lesta has announced that they will add I-54, a Japanese submarine with a controllable catapult aircraft, into testing. There will still be many challenges though, for example, I-400-class are very large ones among their peers that would very likely ended up as rather sluggish handling, not to say what amounts of micro-management will be involved when playing a hybrid, aircraft carrying, submarine. A plenty of material has been collected for potential Soviet CV choices and many were surprised why WG would like to invent a "Project 23 AV" (and curiously make the entire Soviet CV branch as conversions on other hulls) rather than just adapting the Kostromitinov study. And the key point of concern is that how's the relations between the nascent WG Belgrade and the game's original creator team SPB Lesta Studio recently: are they still cooperating on a limited scale, or WG Belgrade is optimistic about their projected capacities in the near future, despite having to resort to brazen (and widely-panned) copy-pastes of Scharnhorst 43 and Stord 43 for some quick short-term profits? Sailing the Halford is good practice. 🙂
Nevermore135 Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Sailor_Moon said: She's probably the replacement for Nelson though....so Tier VII but with different stats. I certainly hope not: she won’t stand out at all at that crowded tier - there are five tier VII British BB premiums (four of them historical!) and two of them are Nelson and Collingwood (a Nelson variant with altered stats/gameplay characteristics). Tier VIII has just Vanguard, and there aren’t a lot of other “historical” options available either unless one wants another KGV hull (the historical Anson or Howe or the original 12-gun KGV design come to mind.) The interesting thing about a tier VIII Rodney is that WG really wouldn’t have to change too much from Nelson to make her a competitive tier VIII. By far Nelson’s biggest weakness is her massive 26mm nose that is overmatched by so many BBs in her matchmaking spread. Give the ship 32mm plating, some AA buffs, and perhaps an extra knot of speed and she’d be in a pretty good place at tier VIII. It would also be easier to work in her historical torpedo armament at tier VIII, because it would be a bit of a shame if she didn’t have them to lob at Bismarcks in game. Edited September 16, 2023 by Nevermore135 3
Wolfswetpaws Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 On 9/14/2023 at 2:16 PM, AdmiralMcintosh said: Can't imagine how overpowered that will be. 2 1
Wolfswetpaws Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 (edited) On 9/14/2023 at 4:17 PM, Sailor_Moon said: It's all but guaranteed that WE will be getting I-54 as well. Just like we'll be getting those Russian subs, and, I suspect, those balance changes. I have to admit, it's about time for HMS Rodney though 😛 Car 54, Where Are You? TV Series 1961–1963 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0054528/ Edited September 16, 2023 by Wolfswetpaws 1
Ensign Cthulhu Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 1 hour ago, Nevermore135 said: It would also be easier to work in her historical torpedo armament at tier VIII, because it would be a bit of a shame if she didn’t have them to lob at Bismarcks in game. Especially now that we have that funny torpedo-launch system the British battlecruiser line uses. 1
Beleaf Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 Rodney would make for a good anniversary reward for the Battle of the Denmark Strait/Hunt for the Bismarck, similar to what they are likely doing with Scharnhorst and Stord 43. Super Naki is kind of ugh 1
Daniel_Allan_Clark Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 Until WG starts leaking improvements in the game rewards system (i.e. a determination not to be so miserly and cheap), there isn't much that will excite me in this kind of thing... ...if that was, indeed, their goal.
Yedwy Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 38 minutes ago, Daniel_Allan_Clark said: Until WG starts leaking improvements in the game rewards system (i.e. a determination not to be so miserly and cheap), there isn't much that will excite me in this kind of thing... ...if that was, indeed, their goal. Their goal is - give less for free and people will buy more incentive… Now if that works out for them or not will be clear soon enough when the next 2 rounds of dividend payouts come round
Efros Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 (edited) 14 hours ago, Ensign Cthulhu said: Especially now that we have that funny torpedo-launch system the British battlecruiser line uses. Ah the Squirly Torps™ Edited September 16, 2023 by Efros
iDuckman Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 (edited) 16 hours ago, Wolfswetpaws said: Car 54, Where Are You? TV Series 1961–1963 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0054528/ LUL The ring tone on my old phone! Partial opening theme. (Apple will sell you a bad cover but doesn't allow your own ring tones.) Blatantly stolen from a riding buddy of mine. People laugh when your phone rings. That was such a fun series. I'm surprised not to have seen it in syndication. Oh! Full episodes are on YouTube. Looks like the whole series! Edited September 16, 2023 by iDuckman 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now