kriegerfaust Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Vindictive_(1918) Name Vindictive Ordered April 1916 Builder Harland & Wolff, Belfast Yard number 500 Laid down 29 June 1916 Launched 17 January 1918 Completed 19 October 1918 Commissioned 1 October 1918 Renamed June 1918 from Cavendish Reclassified Aircraft Carrier, then returned to cruiser, 1924. Training ship in 1937 Repair ship, 1939 Destroyer depot ship, 1944 Identification Pennant number: 31 (July 1918); 48 (September 1919);[1] 36 (1920); I36 (1938); D36 (1940)[2] Fate Scrapped, 1946 General characteristics (as completed 1918) Class and type Laid down as a Hawkins-class heavy cruiser Displacement 9,394 long tons (9,545 t) (light) 12,400 long tons (12,599 t) (deep load) Length 605 ft (184.4 m) (o.a.) Beam 65 ft (19.8 m) Draught 19 ft 3 in (5.9 m) (mean) Installed power 12 × Yarrow boilers 60,000 shp (45,000 kW) Propulsion 4 × shafts; 4 × geared steam turbines Speed 30 knots (56 km/h; 35 mph) Range 5,400 nmi (10,000 km; 6,200 mi) at 14 knots (26 km/h; 16 mph) Complement 648 Armament 4 × single 7.5 in (190 mm) guns 4 × single 3 in (76 mm) guns 4 × single 3 in AA guns 6 × 21 in (533 mm) torpedo tubes Armour Waterline belt: 1.5–4 in (38–102 mm) Deck: 1–1.5 in (25–38 mm) Conning tower: 3 in (76 mm) Aircraft carried 6–12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakob Knight Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 Wait...she was started as a Heavy Cruiser, then converted to a Carrier (one with impressive speed for the time), then converted back to a Cruiser? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriegerfaust Posted March 23 Author Share Posted March 23 HMS Vindictive was a warship built during the First World War for the Royal Navy (RN). Originally designed as a Hawkins-class heavy cruiser and laid down under the name Cavendish, she was converted into an aircraft carrier while still being built. Renamed in 1918, she was completed a few weeks before the end of the war and saw no active service with the Grand Fleet. The following year she participated in the British campaign in the Baltic against the Bolsheviks, during which her aircraft made numerous attacks against the naval base at Kronstadt. Vindictive returned home at the end of the year and was placed in reserve for several years before her flight decks were removed and she was reconverted back into a cruiser. The ship retained her aircraft hangar and conducted trials with an aircraft catapult before she was sent to the China Station in 1926. A year after her return in 1928, she was again placed in reserve. Vindictive was demilitarized and converted into a training ship in 1936–1937. At the beginning of the Second World War she was converted into a repair ship. Her first role after the conversion was completed in early 1940, however, was to transport troops during the Norwegian Campaign. She was then sent to the South Atlantic to support British ships serving there and, in late 1942, to the Mediterranean to support the ships there. Vindictive returned home in 1944 and was damaged by a German torpedo off the coast of Normandy after the Allies invaded France. She was reduced to reserve after the war and sold for scrap in 1946. A cruiser than a Carrier than a training ship than a repair ship finally a troop ship before being scrapped after decades of service Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel_Allan_Clark Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Could be a fun tier 4 or 6 premium...or a start on British light carriers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriegerfaust Posted March 23 Author Share Posted March 23 HMS Argus (I49) (ex-Conte Rosso) 18 15,775 long tons (16,028 t) 12 cylindrical boilers; 4 Parsons geared turbines, 4 shafts: max. speed 20 kn 1914 6 September 1918 Sold for scrap 1946 Ship Aircraft Displacement Propulsion Service Laid down Commissioned Fate HMS Eagle (1918) (ex-Almirante Cochrane) 25-30 26,000 long tons (26,417 t) 32 Yarrow boilers, 4 shafts, Parsons geared turbines: max. speed 24 kn 20 February 1913 20 February 1924 Torpedoed and sunk 11 August 1942, by U-73 Ship Aircraft Displacement Propulsion Service Laid down Commissioned Fate HMS Unicorn (I72) 35 20,300 long tons (20,626 t) 4 Admiralty 3-drum boilers; 4 Parsons geared steam turbines, 4 shafts: max. speed 24 kn 26 June 1939 12 March 1943 Sold for scrap 1960 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriegerfaust Posted March 23 Author Share Posted March 23 A good carrier gimmick would being ably to launch planes individually or in individual flights some ships can launch torpedoes one by one and you do not have to wait for a full squad if you do not have enough aircraft so if we have enough aircraft why is it that we cannot send four instead of eight or three instead of six or nine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invicta2012 Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Vindictive is an interesting one, for sure - but she's not like no other; Furious, Glorious and Courageous were all converted from BCs / Large Cruisers to full aircraft carriers, and you've also got to consider the US Independence class, all of which are converted from Cleveland class ships. The main problem with an appearance in WoWs would be her planes. Very early WW1 era things like Sopwith Camels/Pups, with this thing as her main offensive weapon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sopwith_Cuckoo .... especially when there are loads of useful RN carriers like Argus, Eagle, Formidable, Unicorn, etc, still to appear. 13 hours ago, Jakob Knight said: Wait...she was started as a Heavy Cruiser, then converted to a Carrier (one with impressive speed for the time), then converted back to a Cruiser? The Hawkins class was a giant PITA for the Royal Navy. Built in response to fast German commerce raiders which never really arrived, they were both very modern and very dated in their design (heavy single 7.5 inch guns, manually worked, protected by gun shields... on a lively ship in mid-Atlantic. Not fun) and they set the bar for Treaty cruisers at a very inconvenient point, allowing other nations to build modern 10,000 ton ships when the RN was stuck with these doddery old things. The RN spent years using them as test ships, de-arming them, making plans to add turrets (3 x 2 8 inch, like York, or 4 x 2 6 inch, like Leander), re-arming them again and generally wishing they had a couple more E class instead. Although Emerald in WoWs still gives people who played the original the shivers, the actual E class were very fast, had excellent range, could have radar and AA added without compromise and were generally Very Useful Ships - Enterprise was the test-bed for the twin 6 inch turrets used on Leander and Arethusa, and her bridge design was reworked in the 1920s, becoming a standard design for all RN cruisers after that point). I would quite like to see Effingham in her rebuilt form, though - 8 x 6 inch guns with three at the front and rear, built up in threes like Dido. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakob Knight Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 10 hours ago, kriegerfaust said: A good carrier gimmick would being ably to launch planes individually or in individual flights some ships can launch torpedoes one by one and you do not have to wait for a full squad if you do not have enough aircraft so if we have enough aircraft why is it that we cannot send four instead of eight or three instead of six or nine Problem with this is twofold. First would be that, in the current control scheme, a player can only control one unit at a time. A Hybrid ship can control either the fighter squadron or the ship, but not both. Launching planes individually would mean only a single plane could be aloft at a time. Second would be a follow-on to the first. AA firepower may be reduced from what it used to be, but just about any Cruiser, Battleship, Carrier, and quite a few DDs can shoot down a single plane before it can attack. That would mean launching a single fighter would be only useful as scout planes, which is being nerfed soon. In addition, while you might be able to send a series of scout planes out, it would take as long as an entire squadron to reach the same place. If you then decided to launch a full strike on a target, you would have even fewer planes to spread the AA damage and deliver ordinance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel_Allan_Clark Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 1 hour ago, Jakob Knight said: Problem with this is twofold. First would be that, in the current control scheme, a player can only control one unit at a time. A Hybrid ship can control either the fighter squadron or the ship, but not both. Launching planes individually would mean only a single plane could be aloft at a time. Second would be a follow-on to the first. AA firepower may be reduced from what it used to be, but just about any Cruiser, Battleship, Carrier, and quite a few DDs can shoot down a single plane before it can attack. That would mean launching a single fighter would be only useful as scout planes, which is being nerfed soon. In addition, while you might be able to send a series of scout planes out, it would take as long as an entire squadron to reach the same place. If you then decided to launch a full strike on a target, you would have even fewer planes to spread the AA damage and deliver ordinance. Both hybrids and CVs can control the ship and the plane at the same time (autopilot exists)...hybrids can't fire their main guns, but their secondaries will fire. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now