Jump to content

This Says It All About Current WG


tm63au

Recommended Posts

Words fail me 

 

WG.thumb.jpg.4c9b3521b5debf92ba5eaf0ec10cb1f8.jpg

WG hiring practises are just sad

Some 20 something that just spends his whole day on TIK TOK most likely.

face palm moment

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea I guess they should fire all the the 20 something year old's and close the operation down. What a travesty some one made a mistake.

Edited by clammboy
  • Like 1
  • Bored 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WG staff have very little actual knowledge of naval history.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Daniel_Allan_Clark said:

WG staff have very little actual knowledge of naval history.

To be fair, I imagine most people do. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh no, someone mistook a heavy cruiser for a battlecruiser, only the most controversial ship designation ever!

Anyway...

Edited by tocqueville8
  • Haha 3
  • Bored 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Daniel_Allan_Clark said:

WG staff have very little actual knowledge of naval history.

Your probably right but I'm sure they hired some people with some knowledge and they could proof read these things. But alas things slip by read any internet articles and there littered with misspellings, missing words and wrong dates you know the deal. Lol  

Edited by clammboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, clammboy said:

Your probably right but I'm sure they hired some people with some knowledge and they could proof read these things. But alas things slip by read any any internet articles and there littered with misspellings, missing words and wrong dates you know the deal. Lol  

   Feels like the whole interpretation thing has become a meme in itself.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, clammboy said:

Your probably right but I'm sure they hired some people with some knowledge and they could proof read these things. But alas things slip by read any any internet articles and there littered with misspellings, missing words and wrong dates you know the deal. Lol  

I read the whole thing knowing something was wrong with it and didn't catch it.    Ufff me.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tm63au said:

Words fail me 

 

WG.thumb.jpg.4c9b3521b5debf92ba5eaf0ec10cb1f8.jpg

WG hiring practises are just sad

Some 20 something that just spends his whole day on TIK TOK most likely.

face palm moment

Talk about it to me when your posts are free of errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation.

  • Bored 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bismarck’s in-game ship description was recently changed, and in the new text Prinz Eugen is also erroneously referred to as a battlecruiser.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It must be labelled as such on the spreadsheet. Seems legit. CAF207FC-4197-4D6D-93A9-604272B8A9CB.gif.dcc06e3ca6430eb1c501f13357875d40.gif53EB5C0D-3B99-4A7E-8E10-0AD06C0F515D.gif.201f684365a411bc4b1914e529d99ec2.gif

1 hour ago, Ensign Cthulhu said:

Talk about it to me when your posts are free of errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation.

Well the OP is not being paid as a professional for his typing, where as the WG staff are being paid for their typing skill. Unless you are saying that WG as a company wants to recognize for this type of sloppy work.  Then again WG is no Ubisoft either.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least they put in cruiser so a 50% score right there, they can aim for 75% next time.

He could have called it a Bottlecruiser.

3ef73b1e7c6d1cdd06a1456c016bbee8_640x640

  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, clammboy said:

I'm sure they hired some people with some knowledge

ROFL. You are being sarcastic aren't you? I'd hate to think you were ... serious .... 😏

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Aethervox said:

I just saw a replay in my folder where WG has spelt Aurora as 'Avrora' (in english, today!). Proof of WG spelling idiocy submitted, just for you, 'Cthulhu' 🙂

20240119_193423_PRSC001-Avrora-1917_10_NE_big_race.wowsreplay 1.62 MB · 0 downloads

You need to educate yourself on Russian...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_(given_name)#:~:text=The variant used in the,"Авро́ра" (Avrora).

That's not a misspelling...

Remember, Russian ships use the Cyrillic alphabet, not yours...

Edited by Daniel_Allan_Clark
  • Haha 1
  • Bored 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Daniel_Allan_Clark said:

You need to educate yourself on Russian...

You need to educate yourself on Russian letters to the equivalent English letters. Next time, 'Clark', be a clerk & do your research. 

Also, the spelling is Aurora in both one's port (if you have that ship) & at the WoWS wiki reference for the ship. It is only at the replay folder where someone mis-spells the name from what it is supposed to be in english.

Edited by Aethervox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aethervox said:

You need to educate yourself on Russian letters to the equivalent English letters. Next time, 'Clark', be a clerk & do your research. 

My friend, ANYTHING in English letters is a translation of the Russian.

Avrora is a commonly accepted translation, as I showed you of the ship name. It is, of course, incorrect...as is EVERY spelling in English letters.

  • Bored 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.