Andrewbassg Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 It seems that Wedgie made a ....and the no Cv ranked is actually ......with.Cv's. I think they overlooked to edit the qualificarion stage. That's where i am now and one can select and play ,both Cv;s and subs. GG Wedgie. 5 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewbassg Posted January 11 Author Share Posted January 11 (edited) And yes ....subs too. Edited January 11 by Andrewbassg 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugilistic Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 Its WeeGee. The dexter hand knoweth not what doth the sinister. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n5bar Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 They can f*** up a horse parade! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_KlRlTO_ Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 I don't seem to recall them promising no CVs or Subs in ranked this patch. In fact, the only time they promise that is with odd tiers. You are confusing ranked with CB, and the odd tier from last patch. They fully intend CV and sub to be in ranked. Always do when even tiers are involved. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nevermore135 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 (edited) 16 minutes ago, _KlRlTO_ said: I don't seem to recall them promising no CVs or Subs in ranked this patch. In fact, the only time they promise that is with odd tiers. You are confusing ranked with CB, and the odd tier from last patch. They fully intend CV and sub to be in ranked. Always do when even tiers are involved. You recall incorrectly. Both Silver and Gold Ranked exclude subs and CVs this patch. https://worldofwarships.com/en/news/game-updates/update-130-new-american-aircraft-carriers/#ranked-battles The only question is whether the devs intentionally left Silver qualifiers with the same ship type rules as Bronze (but with Silver tiers and team sizes) or if it was an oversight. Edited January 12 by Nevermore135 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh_Ruka Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 oh lol ... who would have thought ... I want to bet they will change the patch notes 🙂 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leo_Apollo11 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Hi all, I posted it on WG Discord... lets see... Leo "Apollo11" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leo_Apollo11 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 HI all, WG: Quote Right now, thank you for all the reports we're investigating. Leo "Apollo11" 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewbassg Posted January 12 Author Share Posted January 12 (edited) 53 minutes ago, Leo_Apollo11 said: HI all, WG: Leo "Apollo11" Lemme guess " Dear captains! Unfortunately there was a mistake and both Cvs and subs were allowed in ranked battles . We are sorry for the inconvenience this created. The problem will be solved with the next patch" Edited January 12 by Andrewbassg 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leo_Apollo11 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Hi all, Oh Boy... Quote Captains! We would like to inform you that our limitations to CVs & Subs for this season of Ranked in our article were unfortunately incorrect. Sliver League will consist of 6v6 at Tier 8 with all classes allowed. Maximum of 1 Carrier and Submarine per team. Gold League will consist of 6v6 at Tier 10 with all classes allowed. Maximum of 1 Carrier and Submarine per team. The Ranked Season article's text will be updated to reflect this as soon as possible, we apologise for any confusion. Leo "Apollo11" 1 6 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfswetpaws Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 7 minutes ago, Leo_Apollo11 said: Hi all, Oh Boy... Quote Captains! We would like to inform you that our limitations to CVs & Subs for this season of Ranked in our article were unfortunately incorrect. Sliver League will consist of 6v6 at Tier 8 with all classes allowed. Maximum of 1 Carrier and Submarine per team. Gold League will consist of 6v6 at Tier 10 with all classes allowed. Maximum of 1 Carrier and Submarine per team. The Ranked Season article's text will be updated to reflect this as soon as possible, we apologise for any confusion. Leo "Apollo11" Priceless. 😄 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewbassg Posted January 12 Author Share Posted January 12 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Leo_Apollo11 said: Hi all, Oh Boy... i called it!! 14 hours ago, Andrewbassg said: Now I'm pretty much convinced that this "no Cv ranked, but Cv;s are still in"....is not a mistake. No way in hell that Wedgie would let this opportunity to go unexploited. Just as was the case with the infamous indestructible secondaries , when the KM BC's were released, they will claim some braindead "oh oopsie; sorry we did a mistake" sort of crap and let is as is,"just for a patch" just like then. Wedgie wants dollar and everybody and their mother will jump. Playing against this new line, with a good player in ranked......is almost a guaranteed loss. I don't believe for a second that Wedgie will rectify this. And if they don't.... their dishonesty will be laid bare. Edit: And also 5 hours ago, Hugh_Ruka said: oh lol ... who would have thought ... I want to bet they will change the patch notes 🙂 Edited January 12 by Andrewbassg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArIskandir Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Ooops, We did it again... 🤣 On spot meme @Andrewbassg 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nevermore135 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 WG needs to start adding a disclaimer to the official patch notes now. I can’t decide whether this is funny or just sad. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verytis Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Ah yes, another miscommunication by WG. While I'm not bothered by the outcome, they really do need to review their articles better. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HogHammer Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 46 minutes ago, Verytis said: While I'm not bothered by the outcome, they really do need to review their articles better. They just spend too much time on WoWs Discord. Quickly slap together an incoherent sentence > send. (Ouch!) Maybe they should have used a forum to communicate...🤣 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfswetpaws Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Everyone in this topic can simply consider yourselves "reacted to" in a positive manner. Okay? 🙂 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aragathor Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 22 minutes ago, HogHammer said: They just spend too much time on WoWs Discord. Quickly slap together an incoherent sentence > send. (Ouch!) Maybe they should have used a forum to communicate... Maybe they should have a QC department, that isn't terminally online and telling people they're wrong. Because one thing is certain, there's no one checking the stuff they post. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel_Allan_Clark Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Just a reminder, when WG staff complain about being disrespected...ask them how the constant stream of misinformation in WG communications is respectful of the player community. Then, after the resulting bluster and excuses, ask what internal changes are being made to fix the obviously systematic failure to properly and respectfully communicate. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldSchoolGaming_Youtube Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 (edited) WG being up to their standard old trick of blatantly lying ....... sorry "miscommunicating" regarding their 2 "protected classes" ...... Raise your hand if you're shocked by this! Still cant wait to see their upcoming suggested "nerfs" to CVs and Subs. Edited January 12 by OldSchoolGaming_Youtube 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh_Ruka Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Aaaand the Ranked Season is officialy over for me 🙂 With no Asyms and me not being a fan of the reworked Operations, I guess that's it for me this patch ... see you all in the next one ... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArIskandir Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 1 hour ago, OldSchoolGaming_Youtube said: cant wait to see their upcoming suggested "nerfs" to CVs and Subs. I suggest thinking about them in terms of "changes" not properly "nerfs"... just to avoid dissapointment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel_Allan_Clark Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 56 minutes ago, ArIskandir said: I suggest thinking about them in terms of "changes" not properly "nerfs"... just to avoid dissapointment. Indeed. Got to keep the population of CVs and subs in game up to the leaderships targets... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yedwy Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 (edited) Hahaha another “miscommujication” feom the clown company Edited January 12 by Yedwy 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now