Jump to content

Which ship (or ships) do you hate or find most useless?


Kawaii_shirasu_azusa

Recommended Posts

There is no shortage of nasty ships in World of Warships.

The one I hate the most is Sun Yat-sen, it has very bad dispersion and very low damage (whether it's main or secondary guns, or even AA guns)

With the advent of the Japanese battlecruiser line, I have no doubt that Sun Yat-sen was actually born to test the Japanese battlecruiser line (or to harvest those patriot money from China)

It doesn't even have a scout/fighter plane. Hopefully when the Japanese battlecruisers are implemented they can assign their special scout planes to the Sun Yat-sen

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ITL BB's not called Giulio Cesare!

tenor.gif

And Dutch Cruisers

BlushingUnawareAfricanbushviper-size_res

Edited by AdmiralThunder
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I swear to god that I hate Iowa so much. IDK if it's me or something, but I think that she has terrible dispersion, and low alpha, arcs. It also receives a lot of citadel dmg.

 

But at the same time, I can't stop playing her, I want to make her work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russian BBs.  Grinding the Vladivostsuck right now and I swear the whole line should be scuttled and consigned to the deep as artificial reefs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AdmiralThunder said:
1小时前,AdmiralThunder说道:

ITL BB's not called Giulio Cesare!
ITL BB 不叫 Giulio Cesare!

tenor.gif

And Dutch Cruisers  还有荷兰巡洋舰

BlushingUnawareAfricanbushviper-size_res

R.I.Lauria or Marco_polo(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Kawaii_shirasu_azusa said:

R.I.Lauria or Marco_polo(

Marco Polo is terribad.

tenor.gif?itemid=17043180

Jury is still out on the new T10. I have it and while better than the tech tree ships by a lot I am a bit disappointed in the guns. Either RNG is having a laugh at my expense, or they are super troly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, AdmiralThunder said:
16分钟前,AdmiralThunder说道:

Marco Polo is terribad.
马可波罗太糟糕了。

tenor.gif?itemid=17043180

Jury is still out on the new T10. I have it and while better than the tech tree ships by a lot I am a bit disappointed in the guns. Either RNG is having a laugh at my expense, or they are super troly.
新款 T10 尚无定论。我有它,虽然比科技树船好很多,但我对枪有点失望。要么RNG在嘲笑我,要么他们就是超级英雄。

She's good in my hands. Maybe because she's my waifu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Capt_of_Satisfaction said:

Vanguard, De Grasse and Gallant.  
先锋、德格拉斯和加兰。
I hate them 😱
我讨厌他们😱

I don't understand why the Vanguard with advanced fire control has worse dispersion than the Iowa class, that's absurd and unrealistic.Her new 381 shells are not even as good as the old French 381 shells.1160<1190 lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AdmiralThunder said:

ITL BB's not called Giulio Cesare!

tenor.gif

And Dutch Cruisers

BlushingUnawareAfricanbushviper-size_res

Pretty much this 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chumphon. There's a reason the word chump is in the name. Really floaty shells, snail-paced torps, and very fragile. I love cruisers but can't stand the Pan-Asian cruiser line. Hope it gets better at T8 and above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Italian BBs: These ships pay way too much for BB-caliber SAP. IMO, the entire line past tier VI is an exercise in frustration, and this is coming from someone who enjoys playing Roma. WG even had to change a fundamental game mechanic (ammo switching) just to give these ships a special buff to make them more viable. There is a long-running joke that the tech tree Italian BBs were forced to pay a “GC tax,” and it’s not hard to see why. The line is so poorly designed that WoWs Legends implemented the ships completely differently, featuring HE and AP main battery shells and SAP secondaries. I would have abandoned the grind at tier IX if Airship Escort wasn’t running at the time to facilitate power-grinding through Lepanto.

Japanese CLs: This line doesn’t really have a good reason to exist, even if we ignore the fact that the high tier IJN gunboats already behave in many ways like DD-CL hybrids. The large number of guns on these ships are offset by a long reload and the fact that the higher tier ships mount 150mm vs. 155mm (which have the all-important extra mm of HE penetration) is a shame. They were also the second “torpedo-focused” cruiser line release in a row, following the Pan-Asian line which arguably does this playstyle better. To add insult to injury, the more historically appropriate and unique choice for a second IJN cruiser line were aviation (hybrid) cruisers, and WG followed the line up with the game’s first tech tree hybrids: another US BB split.

Dutch cruisers: IMO, every ship in the line, except maybe GL, gives up too much for the airstrike gimmick. At higher tiers, Haarlem and JdW suffer the main weaknesses of CBs (dispersion inferior to other cruisers and 60s burn times) without getting the BB-caliber (283mm+) guns found on other ships of the type. GL is quite nice (I’ve played her on PTS), and is the only reason I am suffering through this grind at the moment. Hopefully I’ll finish JdW while Concealed Maneuvers is still available. The devs finally relenting and giving the ships ASW armament was a good thing, but the fact that it is depth charges rather than depth charge airstrikes (which are found on D7P) was a slap in the face.

 

 

Edited by Nevermore135
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AdmiralThunder said:

ITL BB's not called Giulio Cesare!

tenor.gif

And Dutch Cruisers

BlushingUnawareAfricanbushviper-size_res

I actively hate seeing a GC on the enemy team.

It's like seeing a Flint prior to the CV rework...you know its someone that is good, piloting a brutally overpowered ship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, AdmiralThunder said:

ITL BB's not called Giulio Cesare!

tenor.gif

And Dutch Cruisers

BlushingUnawareAfricanbushviper-size_res

Right here is why it is simply Necessary that I get a larger supply of +1s!

image.thumb.gif.264dfa8094b2e6a984fc16a8a687869b.gif

Ahem.

Right, to answer the question, I'm surprised nobody's nominated Siliwangi; why would anyone play her when Lo Yang exists?

Honourable mention too for my (not anyone else's) HMS Jutland; she's clearly a great ship, but mine's apparently Cursed...

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could surprise people a lot in the Silliwangi...not many realised it was a Loyang in sheeps clothing....either that or people were just laughing too hard at the idiot who took a boat with such a stupid name into battle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Daniel_Allan_Clark said:

I actively hate seeing a GC on the enemy team.

It's like seeing a Flint prior to the CV rework...you know its someone that is good, piloting a brutally overpowered ship.

kKaymkg.jpg

Image1.jpg

Edited by AdmiralThunder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Moses_Mog said:

You could surprise people a lot in the Silliwangi...not many realised it was a Loyang in sheeps clothing....either that or people were just laughing too hard at the idiot who took a boat with such a stupid name into battle.

I have both, and FWIW I'd rate Siliwangi as basically a worse Lo Yang; the exception to that is in the role of torp truck, which the former is better at IMO. In terms of exercising influence on a battle by means of doing the traditional DD jobs, I found Lo Yang to be noticeably better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, AdmiralThunder said:

kKaymkg.jpg

Image1.jpg

😄

I should caveat by saying it's a hate born of envy and the realization of the coming pain I will be feeling while trying to outplay the ship.

I get a really good rush when I manage to beat it though.

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Atlantico - a secondary ship with weak secondaries which get destroyed immediately someone shoots you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are definitely ships that are weaker than other ships of their type at the same tier. 

That said, every one of the tech tree ships I though were the MOST awful early in my game experience turned out to be pretty good after another couple thousand games and a 5% rise in my WR. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me,the Queen Elisabeth always seems to spawn on the flank the lemming train is running away from.  It's always a long, drawn out futile death. 

Edited by Justin_Simpleton
wrong ship
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Pugilistic said:

There are definitely ships that are weaker than other ships of their type at the same tier. 

That said, every one of the tech tree ships I though were the MOST awful early in my game experience turned out to be pretty good after another couple thousand games and a 5% rise in my WR. In my case, I was just playing mine badly. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.