Andrewbassg Posted January 10 Posted January 10 Looks like a new artillery bug. ANY module that improves main gun dispersion is activating twice, once in port, another time in battle Ofc bought to you by no other than the most known bughunter in the world. of warships 5 1
OldSchoolGaming_Youtube Posted January 10 Posted January 10 (edited) It seems like Flamu and his subscribers have found some new bug that affects certain ships that get dispersion buffs by Funny buttons etc, for example giving Conde almost DD dispersion. Edited January 11 by OldSchoolGaming_Youtube 2
Wolfswetpaws Posted January 10 Posted January 10 (edited) Looks like you created your topic about the same phenomena, and enclosing the same youtube video, two minutes before @OldSchoolGaming_Youtube created his topic. 🙂 "hare trigger; bugs bunny draws a gun scene but i voice the lines" Edit: Looks like the two topics were merged by the Moderators. But, they didn't "sign their work". 🤔 Edited January 11 by Wolfswetpaws 1
UnderTheRadarAgain Posted January 11 Posted January 11 Cool. Must play Bungo in ops then before they patch it. 1
Wulf_Ace Posted January 11 Posted January 11 1 hour ago, OldSchoolGaming_Youtube said: It seems like Flamu and his subscribers have found some new bug that affects certain ships that get dispersion buffs by Funny buttons etc, for example giving Conde almost DD dispersion. nop Flamu and his genius subscribers dont find anything, they dont have brain cells to do that. The bug was posted in discord and like always other people find out and then he cant wait to troll WG to earn some toxic fans. It gives better dispersion,a bug, amazing. Report, move on. 2 3
MBT808 Posted January 11 Posted January 11 21 minutes ago, UnderTheRadarAgain said: Cool. Must play Bungo in ops then before they patch it. Doesn’t affect it. He mentions that in the video. It’s limited to modules like ASM1 or ships with burst fire like Alvaro. Combat instructions aren’t affected as shown when he tests satsuma. 1
Aethervox Posted January 11 Posted January 11 (edited) 5 hours ago, Andrewbassg said: Ofc bought to you by no other than the most known bughunter in the world. Isn't that some guy from 'Starship Troopers'? 😁 (AI generated image, btw) Edited January 11 by Aethervox 1 1
Wolfswetpaws Posted January 11 Posted January 11 29 minutes ago, Aethervox said: Isn't that some guy from 'Starship Troopers'? 😁 Starship Troopers (1997) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120201/ Quote Jean Rasczak: This is for all you new people. I have only one rule. Everybody fights, no one quits. If you don't do your job, I'll kill you myself! Welcome to the Roughnecks! 1
Andrewbassg Posted January 11 Author Posted January 11 (edited) 5 hours ago, UnderTheRadarAgain said: Cool. Must play Bungo in ops then before they patch it. Affects ALL ships which can mount disp modules/upgrades AND ALL of them (modules). Mainz in port with the regular disp upgrade: 146m Mainz in training with the regular disp upgrade: 133 m Illinois in port with the regular disp upgrade: 203 m Illinois in training with the regular disp upgrade edit+APRM: 181 m And you can bet that sec disp is ALSO affected across the board Edited January 11 by Andrewbassg 1
Yedwy Posted January 11 Posted January 11 14 minutes ago, Andrewbassg said: Affects ALL ships which can mount disp modules/upgrades AND ALL of them (modules). Mainz in port with the regular disp upgrade: 146m Mainz in training with the regular disp upgrade: 133 m Illinois in port with the regular disp upgrade: 203 m Illinois in training with the regular disp upgrade: 181 m And you can bet that sec disp is ALSO affected across the board If everybody gets the same cards dealt I guess they can then leave it as it is, gunnery in this game is a joke anyway so nothing new there… 1
Andrewbassg Posted January 11 Author Posted January 11 13 minutes ago, Yedwy said: If everybody gets the same cards dealt I guess they can then leave it as it is, gunnery in this game is a joke anyway so nothing new there… Well not exactly coz US bbabbies can mount APRM from T9 onwards. And now bbabbies can smash cruisers even more so..... 1
MBT808 Posted January 11 Posted January 11 34 minutes ago, Andrewbassg said: And you can bet that sec disp is ALSO affected across the board Secondary dispersion is, in fact, not affected. Tested with the aid of @Sailor_Moon 2
Andrewbassg Posted January 11 Author Posted January 11 Just now, MBT808 said: Secondary dispersion is, in fact, not affected. Tested with the aid of @Sailor_Moon Still, how can you tell the difference? Mk1 eyeball? 1
MBT808 Posted January 11 Posted January 11 46 minutes ago, Andrewbassg said: Still, how can you tell the difference? Mk1 eyeball? hit ratio. If the dispersion has been doubled, then the dispersion should get more hits than it would normally. Double 20% dispersion would be quite noticeable on secondaries. 2
Yedwy Posted January 11 Posted January 11 1 hour ago, Andrewbassg said: Well not exactly coz US bbabbies can mount APRM from T9 onwards. And now bbabbies can smash cruisers even more so..... Well yeah, like instead you dying by one full salvo only half of it will be enough to zap you but still one will have been fired... 1
Bryan Handy Posted January 11 Posted January 11 Most, if not all players mount Aiming Systems Mod 1 for dispersion buff, but it didn't help the Vittorio Cuniberti player who last match couldn't strike my super-slippery Cossack at 6km. Nerf the W-A-S-D jinker! It's ok, Wargaming, we've grown accustomed to sequential patch bugs, patch after patch. I luv this game!!!!! 1
Frostbow Posted January 11 Posted January 11 8 hours ago, Wulf_Ace said: nop Flamu and his genius subscribers dont find anything, they dont have brain cells to do that. Your use of ad hominems reveal the one who doesn't have. 😂 1
Wulf_Ace Posted January 11 Posted January 11 10 minutes ago, Frostbow said: Your use of ad hominems reveal the one who doesn't have. 😂 we have a flamu fan boy here 1 1
Frostbow Posted January 11 Posted January 11 42 minutes ago, Wulf_Ace said: we have a flamu fan boy here Calling out your ad hominems does not a fanboy make. 😂
Kruzenstern Posted January 11 Posted January 11 47 minutes ago, Wulf_Ace said: we have a flamu fan boy here In fact it seems more like you are a WG fanboy. That company deserves all the poison Flamu throws at them and then some. Mind you, they aren't any different from most other big publishers, but that doesn't make it any better that quality seems to be inversely proportional to revenue. 1 1
Wulf_Ace Posted January 11 Posted January 11 19 minutes ago, Kruzenstern said: In fact it seems more like you are a WG fanboy. That company deserves all the poison Flamu throws at them and then some. Mind you, they aren't any different from most other big publishers, but that doesn't make it any better that quality seems to be inversely proportional to revenue. dont like streamers that feed on hate. Yeah WG sucks we all know that but still we play ships beacouse we love them. 2
Andrewbassg Posted January 11 Author Posted January 11 (edited) UMMMM........ lLet's ignore the messenger and concentrate on the issue, shall we? We all have our preferences or non-preferences.Nor do I think that either is a damsel in distress, needing a stronk man to jump in to defend. I called him most known, not best, for a reason, although he did prove a non-colleration between consumables and the bug. Edited January 11 by Andrewbassg 1 1
Andrewbassg Posted January 11 Author Posted January 11 That being said, wazz ur prediction on the shelf life of this bug? I think it is related to the Flagships Operations. so we gonna see it for a while...
Ensign Cthulhu Posted January 11 Posted January 11 1 hour ago, Kruzenstern said: In fact it seems more like you are a WG fanboy. WTH? No. I've seen Wulf drop a week's worth of dysentery on WG more than once. If you think he's a WG fanboy= you have issues with perception, my friend. Bugs that improve things for the players across the playerbase should be LEFT UNREPORTED. 1 2
Wolfswetpaws Posted January 11 Posted January 11 53 minutes ago, Ensign Cthulhu said: Bugs that improve things for the players across the playerbase should be LEFT UNREPORTED. 1. That would violate the "truth in labeling" principle. 2. WG/WOWs has published a lot of performance data/specifications on the dispersion of main-gun projectiles for each ship. This "bug" apparently makes all of that data false. 3. Even if this bug improves performance and some players want to keep it, the improved performance may tilt the "balanz" a bit too much. And thus the performance of a number of ships could achieve an average outcome that is undesired for "balanz" purposes? Either a lot of Wiki pages and in-game reference specifications need to be edited (a time-consuming process, at best), or, the "bug" needs to be fixed. Personally, I'm inclined to have the bug fixed. 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now