iDuckman Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 (edited) Here's a link to the application. https://wo.ws/3LYSD9B It is not short and sweet, requiring a writing sample. You can start it and continue later. As a Wiki Editor you can receive: The Wiki patch so your victims will know who killed them A press account containing all ships and potentially all elements in the game. All the beer you can ... what? ... no? Sorry, NVM. Test ships to test and test missions to earn free ships. With seniority, perma-boosters and Alabama VL. Performance-based rewards. A chance to use all that stuff you learned in school. An environment where you can hobnob with some of the most infamous characters in WoWs history. Applications will be judged primarily on writing ability. Good luck!! Edited August 10 by iDuckman 5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOBTHEBALL Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 Submitted and looking forward to hear back, no matter the response! 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel_Allan_Clark Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 Good luck to all the applicants! May your posts be true and informative...and may the office politics stay far away. 🙂 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MBT808 Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 I’d like to, as there are more than a few articles than could stand to be corrected or have outdated information. Captain builds are also an area that needs heavy revision as some of the recommendations either don’t make sense or are valued way too low for the ship in question(for example, Brisk is an extremely valuable skill on Atlantico but is ranked as only frequently useful despite her excellent concealment allowing it to be used throughout the course of a match consistently, as well as being exceptionally valuable in the opening moments of game modes like ranked). Generally I feel like the Captain skills could be better, as some of the information could lead to new or learning players to take bad skills under faulty recommendations made by the wiki(like Tirpitz for example, whoever put those captain skills recommendation should be fired from the wiki team for that stupidity). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nevermore135 Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 (edited) 53 minutes ago, MBT808 said: Captain skills could be better, as some of the information could lead to new or learning players to take bad skills under faulty recommendations made by the wiki(like Tirpitz for example, whoever put those captain skills recommendation should be fired from the wiki team for that stupidity). To be fair, those skill recommendations are at least marginally more useful than the skills suggested in the game client. For some reason the devs gave Tirpitz the same recommended skills as the German battlecruiser line (which all have the same recommendations despite their differing capabilities, but that’s another, bigger issue with WG’s recommendations in general) rather than using the same copy-paste set that is applied to the German battleship line (including Bismarck). It looks like the wiki editor took what WG suggested and at least realized that taking FPE was probably a good idea. Edited August 11 by Nevermore135 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MBT808 Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 1 minute ago, Nevermore135 said: To be fair, those skill recommendations are at least marginally more useful than the skills suggested in the game client. For some reason the devs gave Tirpitz the same recommended skills as the German battlecruiser line (which all have the same recommendations despite their differing capabilities, but that’s another, bigger issue with WG’s recommendations in general) rather than using the same copy-paste set that is applied to the German battleship line. I mean, who's running demolition expert on Tirpitz over Preventative maintenance at tier 1? Sure, it didn't always have the secondary and AA module but not getting your MB or engine(which happens frequently on german BBs) knocked out as frequently is far more useful than a 1% fire chance bonus on the secondaries(on the MB that's not noticeable and Tirpitz's HE isn't worth practically ever using over her AP). But that's just one example, I've seen many other extremely questionable skill recommendations all over. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iDuckman Posted August 11 Author Share Posted August 11 3 hours ago, BOBTHEBALL said: Submitted and looking forward to hear back, no matter the response! Already? Maybe I should have been tougher. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iDuckman Posted August 11 Author Share Posted August 11 2 hours ago, MBT808 said: I mean, who's running demolition expert on Tirpitz over Preventative maintenance at tier 1? Sure, it didn't always have the secondary and AA module but not getting your MB or engine(which happens frequently on german BBs) knocked out as frequently is far more useful than a 1% fire chance bonus on the secondaries(on the MB that's not noticeable and Tirpitz's HE isn't worth practically ever using over her AP). But that's just one example, I've seen many other extremely questionable skill recommendations all over. You have to remember that the wiki has been built over years and through many changes. Yes, we know that there is much that is outdated. However, there is a review process and you won't have carte blanche to alter the skill recommendations. There will be some collaboration. Whatever, I appreciate the passion and look forward to your submission. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewbassg Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 Not gonna lie, looks VERY tempting, but already have two up-to-date accounts. Besides, I tend to be..... salty, which I doubt sits well, ..... nor it should. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asym Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 14 hours ago, iDuckman said: Here's a link to the application. https://wo.ws/3LYSD9B It is not short and sweet, requiring a writing sample. You can start it and continue later. As a Wiki Editor you can receive: The Wiki patch so your victims will know who killed them A press account containing all ships and potentially all elements in the game. All the beer you can ... what? ... no? Sorry, NVM. Test ships to test and test missions to earn free ships. With seniority, perma-boosters and Alabama VL. Performance-based rewards. A chance to use all that stuff you learned in school. An environment where you can hobnob with some of the most infamous characters in WoWs history. Applications will be judged primarily on writing ability. Good luck!! This would be a tempting thing to do........ Sadly, I have a book to finish writing and, I write in the Army writing style that seems to be too "succinct" to fit the WIKI narrative formats... 5 hours ago, Andrewbassg said: Not gonna lie, looks VERY tempting, but already have two up-to-date accounts. Besides, I tend to be..... salty, which I doubt sits well, ..... nor it should. And, I think I'm in the same "boat" so to speak...... To be honest, I already have too many projects in work to tinker with a "game" versus say, working on Anti-drone shotgun based systems concepts for trucks, APC's and tanks..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral_Karasu Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 I'm already infamous, though. 3 1 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aragathor Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 33 minutes ago, Admiral_Karasu said: I'm already infamous, though. Infamous enough for a WG CM to tell you not apply for anything, because you are on a blacklist? Or infamous like MrFingers or SkybuckFlying? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral_Karasu Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 24 minutes ago, Aragathor said: Infamous enough for a WG CM to tell you not apply for anything, because you are on a blacklist? Or infamous like MrFingers or SkybuckFlying? People think they'd like to see my stats until they would get to see my stats kind of infamous. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HogHammer Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 10 hours ago, iDuckman said: Maybe I should have been tougher. I "personally" can tell you it's tough. (LOL) 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel_Allan_Clark Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 (edited) 1 hour ago, Admiral_Karasu said: I'm already infamous, though. Indeed. As am I. I am quite sure WG staff will claim I am a crazy person. Edited August 11 by Daniel_Allan_Clark 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArIskandir Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 17 hours ago, iDuckman said: As a Wiki Editor you can receive: Those are Nice, but what are an editor's obligations? How much time do I need to sink per week? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silence_CN Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 17 hours ago, iDuckman said: All the beer you can ... what? ... no? Sorry, NVM. This could be a problem. A big one. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thornzero Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 1 hour ago, HogHammer said: I "personally" can tell you it's tough. First thing I did this morning was toss my hat into the ring; being well written and having time on my hands. However; after the fact, I took one look at the guys on the team currently and I am not this calibre of player. Nor do I have the years of experience they possess. https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Wiki_Teams So I do not think I will make a short-list but maybe give it the old college try the next time around. Unless they have some room for junior writers/editors that can help with some of the more mundane tasks - the stuff the professionals could use help with. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Type_93 Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 18 hours ago, iDuckman said: All the beer you can ... what? ... no? Sorry, NVM Well, you lost me there. 93 work Gud 4 Beer. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral_Karasu Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 I reckon @iDuckman needs to sweeten the deal. Pray he won't sweeten it any further. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iDuckman Posted August 11 Author Share Posted August 11 2 hours ago, HogHammer said: I "personally" can tell you it's tough. (LOL) I keep that one on my desk, right next to the 'You're Fired' stamp. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iDuckman Posted August 11 Author Share Posted August 11 (edited) 1 hour ago, ArIskandir said: Those are Nice, but what are an editor's obligations? How much time do I need to sink per week? A fair question, and one that's on the application. You tell us what you can afford to commit; we'll tell you if it's enough. Secret Rule of Wiki: RL comes first. By and large, in the ship pages an article a month is more than enough. -------- Now, as to obligations, there are rules that I can't talk about. If you've seen Fight Club you understand. Wiki editors are content creators and content maintainers. A couple are infrastructure specialists. You will have to understand a subject (ship or rules section) and write about it. The other half of the job is formatting. WikiMedia has a unique formatting grammar, and there is a Style Guide to follow. For instance, direct references to ships are set in italics. Part of the induction process and probation is learning what there is to be done and settling into your slot. Oh, that and the hazing. Edited August 11 by iDuckman 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iDuckman Posted August 11 Author Share Posted August 11 1 hour ago, thornzero said: First thing I did this morning was toss my hat into the ring; being well written and having time on my hands. However; after the fact, I took one look at the guys on the team currently and I am not this calibre of player. Nor do I have the years of experience they possess. https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Wiki_Teams So I do not think I will make a short-list but maybe give it the old college try the next time around. Unless they have some room for junior writers/editors that can help with some of the more mundane tasks - the stuff the professionals could use help with. Damn super-unicums are high maintenance. It would be nice to have a player of my own caliber around. There is plenty of provision for consultation with the unicorns should you desire. Your ability as a player is not really a criteria. However, we do want someone with enough games to know how the thing works. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iDuckman Posted August 11 Author Share Posted August 11 1 hour ago, Type_93 said: Well, you lost me there. 93 work Gud 4 Beer. The simple fact is, I can't afford to keep you guys in beer and WeeGee keeps theirs for themselves. 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Type_93 Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 5 minutes ago, iDuckman said: The simple fact is, I can't afford to keep you guys in beer and WeeGee keeps theirs for themselves. Keeping this lot in beer would bankrupt a country with a GDP like France. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now